Kevin Burns Blog

People-View is how you talk about your crew to other supervisors or even your buddies behind the crew members' backs. “Keep it simple and as short as possible. These guys don’t want a lot of information and they won’t remember most of it anyway. And don’t make it too complex or it’ll go right over their heads. And don’t give them too many breaks or they’ll take their time coming back. Some of them might even take off from the meeting. You can’t trust them. They’ll take a shortcut if they can find one.” Is that the people-view for your crew? Is this how you talk about your crew to other supervisors or even your buddies behind the crew members' backs? Is that what you would say to an outside speaker or guest getting ready to address your people? People-view is how you view people - specifically your people, your co-workers. People-view is the predetermined opinions you have about either the people you work with or those you do business with. That includes job site contractors and subcontractors. Command-and-control is the default management style for supervisors and safety people who lack basic safety leadership skills. Chapter and verse from the rule book is easy because there is no arguing the rules. Supervisors and safety people, the unskilled ones, are quick to write up job site infractions. Like a cop at the side of the highway, they get compliance through enforcement and threat. They view everyone under them as potential law-breakers. You can’t build a relationship of trust and respect with a people-view like this. If you think your people aren’t capable of grasping safety concepts, that will affect how you treat them. It will, more importantly, affect the relationship you have with them. How do you view your crews and employees? Here are four self-test questions to help you identify your own people view:

Safety people and supervisors who lack a healthy dose of willingness to engage crew members on a human level will limit both themselves and their crews. Safety people and supervisors who lack a healthy dose of willingness to engage crew members on a human level will limit both themselves and their crews. It doesn’t happen on purpose, but it happens. The inexperienced supervisor who doesn’t know how to motivate and develop individuals on the job, ultimately has a harder time getting the job done. If there is no strategy to continuously improve employees, there’s little chance of improving the organization as a whole, and that includes safety.

Safety people and supervisors get concerned when their employees won't buy-in to safety. They also complain about employees' lack of engagement and a lack of accountability in the safety program. But what if the safety messaging is aimed below the intellect of the same people you're trying to reach? What if you've dumbed it down too far? What if you've underestimated your own people? Communications that miss the target can undermine your efforts in safety. Generic slogans and feeble safety campaigns downloaded from the Internet do not resonate with most people (Hint: there's a reason they're free for the taking on the Internet). And people do not connect with anything that doesn't resonate with them. A slogan for a slogan’s sake can do more harm than good. Generic safety messages are like an ill-fitting suit. Buy a suit off the rack and it looks like a cheap attempt to dress-up. But go to a tailor and have one built specifically for youy and you are willing to wear it proudly. The same too with a safety message. It has to fit perfectly, or your people won't wear it.

Lack of engagement is a problem in every corner of every organization. Safety has called this problem complacency. Engagement is the biggest problem in the workplace today. The Gallup surveys tell us that 71% of employees are NOT actively engaged. You would think that a 71% level of disengagement would be cause for grave concern for companies. After all, poor safety performance and lost productivity creates a huge financial mess. Companies pay more and get less.

If you want to become an effective and respected safety leader, work on these personality traits. Back in 2009, when Google first launched their Project Oxygen employee survey, they were looking for a way to help their managers be better. They were also looking for ways that managers and supervisors could help engage employees better.

Improve an employee's motivation to do the work and you improve their motivation to do the work safely. As a front-line safety person or supervisor, you have the greatest impact on employee motivation. The words you use, your facial expressions, and your demeanor all speak without words on how much you value the people you work with.

In order for a safety partnership to work, there has to be mutual benefit. The television shows Shark Tank (USA) and Dragon’s Den (Canada, UK, Australia) feature a panel of investors looking for a great product or idea to get behind. The entrepreneur makes a pitch to the investors. If the pitch is successful, the venture gets backing. If the pitch misses, or if the investors deem that there is too little benefit to them, they won’t invest.

Improve individual safety performance and you improve team safety numbers. This is Part 4 of the Traits of Safety Leaders. To read the first three parts go to: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.

Safety improves when engagement improves. Engagement improves when supervisors and safety people make it a point to value the people that they work with. An untrained or under-skilled supervisor or safety person tends to get the basics done. Nothing more. Get production. Stay within the safety rules. Everybody goes home safe (fingers crossed). Job done. Except, the job is not done. In fact, it could be argued that job is systematically being undone. If you’re focused on just getting it done, you may be missing the biggest part of the safety picture.

Helping employees overcome their tolerance to safety rules paves the way for them to see their own win for buying-in to safety. You may live in a neighborhood or community that has a few annoyance problems. Loud muffler vehicles, noisy and nosy neighbors, people who don’t clean up after their dogs all annoy you. But what are you going to do? Yeah, sure, you wish that people were more respectful and courteous. Heck, you even complain to your other neighbors about the carryings-on of the disturbers. But, you don’t have the time or the motivation to take on something that will take effort so you tolerate it. Even though you’re not alone in your annoyance, it’s too big a fight. What’re you gonna do? Now what happens at work when similar issues arise? You’re forced to fill out paperwork safety forms that you swear no one looks at. You’re forced to sit through the same deck of boring PowerPoint slides at safety meetings. You have to endure that one supervisor who has a chip on his shoulder and a badge of authority is his hand. Heck, you even complain to your co-workers about the things you’re forced to endure. But, you don’t have the time or the motivation to take on something that will take effort so you tolerate it. Even though you’re not alone in your annoyance, it’s too big a fight. But, what’re you gonna do? That is not complacency. That is tolerance. And tolerance should become a serious consideration for supervisors and safety people.